Using Coursebooks – part 1

This topic has been on my mind since I read Damian Williams’ blogpost defending coursebooks. He is, among many other things, a coursebook writer, so his opinion might be biased. I’m not a coursebook writer, however, but I do like using coursebooks. Or maybe a better way of putting it is I think I have learned to make the most of them.

I’ve been teaching for a little over 11 years now, mostly at Language Centers. One thing every place I have worked at has in common is the use of coursebooks. Some came from international publishers, others were produced in-house. Some were more up-to-date or more interesting than others. Whatever their flaws, I can safely say I have taught some of my best lessons using coursebooks.

This has been a recent topic of discussion in the BrELT chat, and I would like to offer my two cents on how to approach some of the things I find good and bad about coursebooks.

Make the most of what they offer

One of the things I like about modern coursebooks is that they are reliable source of texts and listening texts (henceforth referred to as texts). Contrary to what some may say, I tend to find them interesting. Also, if I am being honest, sometimes the great thing about coursebooks is that they are there. I am a big fan of authentic materials, but those tend to be time-consuming in terms of preparation.

What coursebooks often don’t do, in my opinion, is explore the lexis in texts to its fullest extent. Texts are often used as a way to explore grammar patterns at the expense of vocabulary, which is often relevant for students. This is where I think the teacher can make a difference by making students aware that there is more to these texts than they might realize.

Take for example a listening activity from an advanced (CEF C1) coursebook I use. The topic is crime and the coursebook provides some relevant pre and while-listening questions. The listening, then, is explored with grammar in mind (prepositions in relative clauses, in case you are wondering). There is nothing to stop you from using the tapescript, though, in order to delve into the rich vocabulary students would likely ignore.

I usually select words/expressions/chunks of language from the script and try to get them from passive vocabulary into active vocabulary. I try to find pieces of language that students may already know, but might not use in speaking or writing. I also choose things I imagine students have not come across, but I believe it is important not to choose lexis just because it is “difficult”.

So, after carrying out the listening activity as usual, I put the selected words/expressions/chunks on the board and ask students to find them on the tapescript. I think it is helpful to have them in the same order they appear on the script. Moreover, if it is a long script or if there are multiple speakers, it might be worth pointing out where students can find the language they are looking for. In the example below, the numbers in red indicate which speaker used each expression.

coursebooks_1

From there, you can put students in pair or trios and get them to guess the meanings from context. Alternatively, you could possibly provide them with some definitions to match. If you have access to an Interactive Whiteboard, students can go to the board and match the definitions themselves.

I follow this up with questions I think my students would find interesting (in this case they are 15 to 17 year-olds). By having them find the expressions on the script, talk about their meaning and then answering questions you are exposing students to the language multiple times. This, in turn, increases the chances they will be able to use these items in the future.

coursebooks_2Come back on Thursday for part 2, where I talk about things I don’t like so much about coursebooks and how I adapt them.

Thanks for reading.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Using Coursebooks – part 1

  1. Thanks for the post, Ricardo. I am a fan of course books too. Learners also tend to like them since they usually become their first source of reference. Last term, a colleague and I delivered a course for teachers on how to explore/adapt published materials and course books were, obviously, dealt with. By adapting published materials we can boost motivation, learning and make classes more meaningful.

    Like

  2. Hi Ricardo,

    Sorry for taking so long to read your post but life has been kind of hectic lately. You really do your best in everything you do. I feel very proud of you, dear friend. Congratulations!!!

    Like

  3. Pingback: Using coursebooks – part 2 | ricardo barros elt

  4. Well, I’m an author myself, so my opinion is biased, too. But I agree with you: good coursebooks (and, boy, are they getting better!) usually help, rather than hinder students’ learning. And you’re right about useful lexical chunks – especially the stuff that students can recognize but not actively produce – often getting overlooked.

    Like

  5. Pingback: So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish | ricardo barros elt

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s